![]() | Doubling the Capacity of the LIRR | The Oil Drum: Local | Geophysicist Klaus Lackner on Fueling the Future | ![]() |
12 comments on Restoring Staten Island's Rail Connections
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
12 comments on Restoring Staten Island's Rail Connections
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
Blogroll
NY Blogs
- Gothamist
- Starts & Fits
- Aaron Naparstek
- Baloghblog
- One Atlantic
- bikeblog
- Curbed
- Urban Digs
- OnNYTurf
- Daily Gotham
- StreetsBlog
Local Organizations
- NYC Peak Oil Meet-up
- Peak Oil NYC
- Transportation Alternatives
- Time's Up
- Straphanger's Campaign
- Regional Plan Association
- Green Homes NYC
- Tri-State Transportation Campaign
- Harbor Rail Tunnel
- Auto Free NY
- Walk NY
- Bridge Tolls Advocacy
- Vision 42nd Street
- Car Free
- Right of Way
- Upper Green Side
Local Media
National Peak Oil Sites
Webrings
|
|
|
|
User login
Personnel
Classic posts
Archives
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
PONYC Archives
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.




GAIA Host Collective
Unfortunately, that is unlikely to happen, since subway or light rail type rolling stock is not allowed to share tracks with freight trains, unless the passenger cars meet ridiculously high collision standards (basically, the train has to be strong enough to stand a 10 car train on end without the bottom car bending). And I think this whole "light rail" business is a bad idea, since Staten Island already has a perfectly good heavy rail line, and indeed much of the heavy rail infrastructure is still there along the North Shore Line, notably the viaduct through Port Richmond. On the other hand, they could extend the HBLR over the Bayonne Bridge, and provide a transfer with the North Shore Line. It's unfortunate that thanks to Bob Moses it is impossible to run a subway line over the Verrazano Bridge, but it might be possible in the far future to build a tunnel from St. George to Bay Ridge.
Another option, somewhat from the realm of fantasy, is to replace the Staten Island express buses with light rail, with street trackage feeding into a line in the middle of the expressway, and then going over the bridge, down the Gowanus Expressway in Brooklyn, and then through one of the Brooklyn Battery Tunnel tubes into a street line up, say, a Broadway that has been dedicated to pedestrians and light rail.
You are right about light rail sharing with freight. I was more thinking that they could build new light rail lines along the same ROW. It would either need to use new tracks or be heavy rail. Frankly you are right that considering how much heavy rail exists, it might actually be a better fit. I'm not sure if the politicos have picked up on that nuance or if they just assume light rail is easier in principle.
If Staten Island we a part of New Jersey instead of New York, I'm sure NJ transit would already have several rail links to their regional rail hubs in Newark, Secaucus, Jersey City, etc.
Re: Verrazanno - The Tunnel would be cool! Until then a dedicated bus lane can do a lot of good work during rush hour.