...

You DO realize that I said that we shouldnt concentrate on the 'hydrogen' economy even with interesting new technology that I've linked.  And you are a fool if you believe that I said we should concentrate solely on solar for our alternatives.  I'm advocating a basket of renewable and some non-renewable energy systems.  Let me go down the list for you again:

Solar, Wind, Tidal, Hydro, Geothermal, Nuclear and Biofuels CAN offset our 'fossil fuel' consumption and allow us to enjoy a future world based on sustainable, low polluting energy.  Individually, none of the above listed alternatives can hope to replace Fossil Fuels, but together, they just 'might' be able to get the job done.

As for your hydrogen rant, you only repeated what I ALREADY SAID.  It takes energy to produce hydrogen from water, and it seems moronic to then 'burn' that hydrogen in any kind of combustion engine.  It makes slightly more sense, albeit still a bad idea, to take said hydrogen, store it in a stable compound and use it in a fuel cell which has 2.5x the efficiency of a regular ICE.  I know that hydrogen is a energy carrier, not an energy producer.  Thats why I think the future is in EVs and perhapse some unique hybrid-biofuel vehicles.

I'm with you. This site is becoming to self-reflecting in its pessimism.
I personally like to refract pessimism--but to each his own, to each his own...
Either way (reflection or refraction), as long as it is concentrated to a tasteful intensity.