![]() | Commission to Formulate Traffic Reduction Policy | The Oil Drum: Local | How Walkable is Your Neighborhood? | ![]() |
46 comments on City Launches GreeNYC Educational Campaign
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
46 comments on City Launches GreeNYC Educational Campaign
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
Blogroll
NY Blogs
- Gothamist
- Starts & Fits
- Aaron Naparstek
- Baloghblog
- One Atlantic
- bikeblog
- Curbed
- Urban Digs
- OnNYTurf
- Daily Gotham
- StreetsBlog
Local Organizations
- NYC Peak Oil Meet-up
- Peak Oil NYC
- Transportation Alternatives
- Time's Up
- Straphanger's Campaign
- Regional Plan Association
- Green Homes NYC
- Tri-State Transportation Campaign
- Harbor Rail Tunnel
- Auto Free NY
- Walk NY
- Bridge Tolls Advocacy
- Vision 42nd Street
- Car Free
- Right of Way
- Upper Green Side
Local Media
National Peak Oil Sites
Webrings
|
|
|
|
User login
Personnel
Classic posts
Archives
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
PONYC Archives
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.




GAIA Host Collective
Look, I understand when one moves to an urban area there are certain life-styles that must be encouraged, but God help you if you do #10 and your hard-drive fails.
Bring your own cloth bag to the grocery store? Why in the name of Maliki would we need to do that? I guess no one told the people of New York that paper is a renewable resource (dont' argue with me on this, half my family in Oregon is in the tree business).
Sounds like the standard of living for Americans in cities is about to get really, really bad.
We don't need to recycle paper. We're not running out of it. Paper use is way, way down thanks to technology.
I've talked to quite a number of people that know a lot of about the paper v. plastic debate and certainly from an energy perspective, it seems paper is the loser. It also takes up more room in a landfill.
I know we have many well managed sustainable forests in this country, but I think we should reserve that for other purposes heating and making furniture.
In Taipei it's illegal for a supermarket to provide any bag to shoppers. I think most people bring a wad of plastic bags from home, and reuse them dozens or maybe hundreds of times. This is pretty environmentally friendly, because the bags are reused so many times before being trashed.
I think Taipei's solution is a lot more reasonable than cloth bags for Greens vs. paper/plastic for Normals. The cloth bag is too small, making them requires a lot more fuel & water than a paper or plastic bag, and washing them wastes fuel & water too. I'm sure a lot of people will periodically buy new bags as fashion statements, then toss the old bag in the landfill. Some bags will be encrusted with rhinestones and other high-energy-waste decorations...
In my house in Los Angeles, we take paper & plastic bags home from the grocery store, where they pass through progressively dirty uses until they get broken or slimy. The paper becomes mulch for the garden, and the plastic is thrown away or used in the garden.
One very special paper bag gets to be my lunch bag, until it gets too broken or slimy for that, when it becomes mulch too.
To the top 10 recommendations for New York City I'd add:
x. bag your lunch, and reuse the paper bag. bring a thermos of coffee to work from home.
Today I went to "Vien Dong III Superfood Warehouse" and scored fixings for twelve bulging "Subway" style sandwiches, for about eight bucks. The savings is enough to buy a tank of gas for my car. Replacing a Starbucks habit with a thermos buys another 1/2 tank for me. :)
OT but - has anyone seen Japanese reality TV lately? It's all about forcing D-list celebrities to live together under survival conditions.
In one I saw tonight, two D-list comedians were put on a boat and told that, for the next few weeks they must live on the boat and eat only the fish they caught. They deftly prepared all kinds of meals. I never knew that D-list comedians could cook.
In another one, the Japanese equivalent of a "Spice Girl" made a complex four-course meal entirely of bread crust, in order to meet a $1 price requirement. Spice Girls are frugal cooks?
The Japanese sure do appreciate hardship!
Bryan
"Some bags will be encrusted with rhinestones and other high-energy-waste decorations..."
DAMN those confounded fashionistas! SUCH troublemakers.
(heh heh)
The cloth bag is too small
Too small? Get a bigger cloth bag then. Or is there just one size of bag in LA? I have several cloth bags that carry more than a plastic bag, and I don't have to worry about too much weight breaking them or double bagging.
making them requires a lot more fuel & water than a paper or plastic bag, and washing them wastes fuel & water too.
Well, since cloth bags predate the use of fossil fuels, I'll go out on a limb and say that they don't need use that much fuel, and they also can be made from old cloth in recycling efforts. Washing them doesn't come up much either; you don't have to wear them, just carry them. The fashion sense concern is pretty minimal (perhaps a skewed LA perspective?). Hardly anyone who would carry a fashionable bag like you described (teenage girls, one would expect) would actually be carrying groceries very often.
And to really cut down on the bags, get a backpack, and carry the heavy stuff on your back (20-30 lbs on the back is a hell of a lot easier than in your hand).
If you're carrying fresh meats and vegetables home in a cloth bag, it had better be clean. If each meat or vegetable you put in the cloth bag already has its own plastic bag, or each dried good you put in the cloth bag already has its own cardboard box, then how are you saving the environment with the cloth bag?
Of course, if these products are all made by enormously fossil fuel subsidized processes to begin with, then the cloth bag is just a convenient way to enjoy the benefits of fossil fuels without feeling guilt for destroying the natural world. :)
I use paper bags for groceries because I can recycle them. I “favor” plastic bags because I have to pick up after a dog. My wife has a big canvas tote she hauls to work; still works fine 16 years later. Plastic effectively never breaks down, not even biodegradable plastic.
“Plastic bags clog everything from sewer drains to the gullets of sea turtles that mistake them for jellyfish. Increasingly, purportedly biodegradable versions were available. Thompson’s team tried them. Most turned out to be just a mixture of cellulose and polymers. After the cellulose starch broke down, thousands of clear, nearly invisible plastic particles remained.
Some bags were advertised to degrade in compost piles as heat generated by decaying organic garbage rises past one hundred degrees Fahrenheit. “Maybe they do. But that doesn’t happen on a beach, or in salt water.” He’d learned that after they tied plastic produce bags to moorings in Plymouth Harbor. “A year later you could still carry groceries in them.””
http://www.orionmagazine.org/index.php/articles/article/270/
It would appear that you are, once again, pulling data out of thin air or, ummm, somewhere else. Where is the data on paper consumption? In addition, paper production is one of the most polluting industries we have. Just because you apparently need to waste paper, doesn't mean that the rest of us will experience a reduced standard of living by using cloth bags, which are reusable.
The energy and other inputs required to produce paper are not renewable any more than the inputs required to produce ethanol are renewable. It is a polluting, energy intensive process. When thrown in a land fill, it might as well almost be plastic given the amount of time it takes to degrade.
Why throw powerplant fuel into landfills?
Funny you should mention this. At Salon today:
"Plastic Bags are Killing Us."
http://salon.com/news/feature/2007/08/10/plastic_bags/
It would appear that you are, once again, pulling data out of thin air or, ummm, somewhere else. Where is the data on paper consumption? In addition, paper production is one of the most polluting industries we have. Just because you apparently need to waste paper, doesn't mean that the rest of us will experience a reduced standard of living by using cloth bags, which are reusable.
Uhmmm...hate to break it to you...pollution isn't the problem it was in the late 60s and early 70s.
Secondly, most of the paper products we use aren't from America's forests anymore.
Cloth bags. Talk about doing the work for ADM. "Heh, heh, we'll save money on bags by convincing them they should bring cloth bags...", you want to be a tool of big Agriculture, be my guest.
geez, I guess you can fool some of the people all of the time (except me as I'm on to their game.
BRussellNM,
"...pollution isn't the problem it was in the late 60s and early 70s."
You might want to reevaluate...
http://www.orionmagazine.org/index.php/articles/article/270/
Paper consumption is up about 10 times what it was before the computer became a household item. Everything is sent out in triplicate and printed four times to get it right, Instead of having a meeting over lunch to discuss it.
"Pollution isn't a problem"
Have you ever lived near a paper mill? The paper process itself isn't necessary. The modern sulfuric acid process which replaced hemp and created the Anti-Marijuana Government/Police Complex was a stock investment/crooked politician conspiracy of the Hearst family. Look it up.
Hemp bags, woven by hand. Baskets made from swamp reeds.
There's a lot of people in New York who will have nothing to do when the stock market melts.
tstreet,
Paper degrades very well in a compost heap, Worms love it, as well as ,unfortunately, termites and roaches. We have people around TOD who worry about fertiliser after the peak. Worm castings make a premium fertiliser. the only secret is keep the paper wet enough to be edible by the worms. Go to any decent garden supply and look in the organic fertiliser section...duh...its about 3 times the cost of chemical fertiliser
Many people are interested in a small farm as a way to survive the energy downslope. Worm farms are an excellent source of fish bait, or worms can be fed to chickens or farm-raised fish. The secret is to raise your bed, put screen in the bottom and collect the falling worm crap as fertiliser. Then you don't have to stoop to dig worms, and the worm castings can be collected on sheet plastic or recycled plywood, swept up put in a paper bag and sold. Worms themselves can either be sold or bartered for fish.
Paper, if clean, is also recyclable. Recycling companies buy it . Havent you ever noticed the bales of cardboard behind supermarkets? How about the dumpsters behind schools where they sell used paper to help pay for school items like band uniforms? Why do cities collect it and sell it at recycling centers? In Houston they even have probationers working off their community service sepatating paper, glass and plastic from the trash stream.
Tree farms help absorb CO2, and yes, they are renewable. They help both clean the atmosphere and since they absorb light, are positive on global warming. Tree farms, lumbering and paper mills are decent local jobs, and before we exported all those manufacturing jobs to China, the US made millions of tons of paper. Now we send bales of cardboard boxes around half the world. The container ships that go back to China after bringing in Wallmart crap go back with our recyclables-paper, used metals, and cotton rags for the better grades of paper. And this has to change back to the old, frugal methods or our whole world is doomed. And, theres talk of charcoal for terra preta all the time on this site. Paper would make a good source of cellulose.
Sometimes I get astounded at this site. We've got some true scientists and experts, and we also have a bunch of ninnies who talk through their ass. Talking about a forest as non renewable or how paper clutters up landfills when it should be recycled is just stupidity and insulting BMRussellNM and a putting him down is just abhorant and ignorant. Is this a hen party where we pick scapegoats apart?
My grandfather, Eugene D. Ebersole ran the Lumberman's Association of Texas from 1943 until he retired in 1969. Lumbering was the third largest industry in the state for many years, behind cattle and oil. I've recycled for 35 years, and had gardens since I was a kid. And I'm proud of my grandfather. He was a WWI hero, won the French Croix de Guerre for carrying out wounded French soldiers on a stetcher in the Argonne Forest. He was a perfect gentleman, and personally kind. He was a conservative, but of the old fashioned type who was frugal and hard working and believed in the Bill of Rights. Besides his service in running a trade association, he was a fundraiser for the Republican Party on a part time basis, and I loved him and miss him still sometimes.He also kept his family in good style through the great depression, which started when he was about 33 with a wife and two children.
Bob Ebersole
"The United States is one of the biggest consumers of paper in the world. Between 1990 and 2002, paper consumption in the United States increased from 84.9 million tons to 97.3 million tons." Wikipedia
Wiki is your source??
Okay.......right...sure...whatever you say..
You can get the raw data from
http://www.census.gov/prod/1/manmin/asm/m93as-1/m93as-1a.pdf (for 1992-1993)
and
http://www.census.gov/prod/2006pubs/am0531gs1.pdf
for 2002-2005, in which period usage has continued to rise.
I agree that the technology already exists to enable us to use far less paper, but paper is still way too cheap, and hence gets used very wastefully.
Re: #10. Have you ever heard of backups? I store an encrypted file of important stuff in my Yahoo! briefcase.
Re: "paper is a renewable resource"/ "We don't need to recycle paper. We're not running out of it.". It takes energy and other resources to recycle paper, and even more to produce it from raw materials. Quite a lot of time too, as you have to grow the trees.
This is about conservation of energy and resources, and increased efficiency in the deployment of resources. It is not about continued, mindless consumption.
Why do so many people not seem to realise that efficiency can save you money while not impacting your lifestyle?